I will be frank with you, this is not an easy post for me to write, but it has been a long time in coming. The recent events in Beirut, Lebanon and Paris, France have made me realize I need to say my peace.
I have been a toy photographer for four years, and in that time I have noticed a shift away from stylized photos of toys and figurines towards realism and violence in the Instagram toy photography community. I do not know if this is due to the popularity of certain toys based on popular tv shows (Breaking Bad and The Walking Dead), comic book anti-heroes like Batman, Wolverine, Bane and Deadpool or comic book villains like The Joker and Harlequin. Maybe it is due to our constant quest for realism in conjunction with pushing the envelope of special effects. What ever the reason, I find this trend disturbing.
This is not a scientific report based on any sound clinical data, just a general unease I feel when I flip through the photos of those I follow or look through one of the Toy Pop sessions.* I have noticed over the last several months that as photographers have tried to bring their toys to life a lot of blood is getting shed. Gone are the days when a simply beautiful photo with nice bokeh would get you noticed. Now you need to fling some dirt to emulate flying debris and shed some blood. I follow some pretty impressive photographers and they are able to make this all look surprising realistic.
But it is not just the special effects that I find disturbing, but the apparent glorification of some extremely despicable characters that dominate our pop culture world. Who hasn’t seen a gloriously beautiful photo of The Joker or Darth Vader? I know it seems like an insignificant point, but I can’t help but think that every photo that glorifies these characters brings them, and their actions, a little closer to an acceptable norm.
In a world in which school shootings, beheadings and suicide bombers are on the front page of the newspapers (seemingly daily) I can’t decide if the violence I see in my feed is a reflection of the violence consuming our world or is it feeding the violence in some subtle way? Are we a society that is so numb to the chaos going on around us that it takes a toy being eviscerated to get our attention in the onslaught of images uploaded to the internet daily?
We here at Stuck in Plastic are all adults playing by adult rules and adult themes are not uncommon (any one remember Perv Woody?). But I also know that because we “play” with toys we have a responsibility to all the children and young adults who follow us on our preferred social media platform. I think it is imperative that we set a good example for our followers, that we reflect the values we want to see in our society played out in the photography that we post. Anything less is saying that we value violence above peace, blood above beauty.
These are extremely difficult topics to bring up and I know many of you won’t agree with me. But I sincerely believe that we each have the power to change our world and move to a path of peace and away from violence. Many of us have significant reach on our social media platforms and we should seek to use that reach to start a conversation, to set an example, to change the course of history.
I am not asking anyone to not show violence or the dark side of human nature. I am simply asking for the glorification to stop. The elevation of violence to an act of beauty when in reality it is often a cowardly action that has far reaching consequences. Many of which we rarely give a thought to.
I for one, am sick of seeing vigilante justice, mercenary anti-heroes and beheadings on my Instagram feed. Do people really think that somehow because they are toys that it is ok? Personally I think it makes it worse. We have the power to change our world, lets start acting like it. Let’s start posting photos that reflect the world we want, not the one we have.
~ xxSJC
How do you feel about toy on toy violence? Am I overreacting or do you feel the same way?
If you have a photo that reflects the world you dream of living in please tag it #toysforpeace. If we can visualize it, we can create it…together.
* Toy Pops are a way for new toy photographers to connect with other members of the community by participating in a “session” were you post one new image to a specific tag. You then like and comment on all the other photos in the same tag during the 45 minute session. If you want to know what the hip toys are that are being collected, or to see who the newest up and coming photographers are, Toy Pops a great place to explore.
Well said, Shelly! I’ve been speaking at a lot of schools this fall, and it’s made me aware of the kinds of images I post, because the kids love LEGO and do check my feed. It’s one of the reasons I’ve focused on building and photographing MOCs of late. If we can encourage young people to build and create, we offer them hope for the future.
Thank you Lyn! I really appreciate it, I feel Ive gone out on a limb here. But hope is what we so desperately need right now. Thank for all you do to spread that message through your words and deeds. Shelly
Well written, Shelley! To me, violence is often the opposite of creativity. “The only way I can make this interesting, is by shock value.” I’ll take your serene shots of minifigures in nature over ketchup-drenched knife fights any day.
And violence in toy photography has the added impact of being accessible to children. If my shots attract a young audience I feel a responsibility to serve suitable content. If I want to change the themes, I will also change the way I present my shots. Maybe a new private feed, but probably not Instagram at all because I feel it’s supposed to be open and accessible.
Your post had to be written, thanks for doing it.
David, thank you for your support and kind words. You’re right, IG should be an open platform for all to view. It is our responsibility to create images that reflect our world, question the status quo, work for change…but never at the expense of our audience. I am so glad I am not the only in feeling that we have a responsibility to our young audience. I hope we can create a better world through our toy photography and the connections we make here. Shelly 😀
We live in a sick world . I always get shocked about the news. What’s up with all the terrorists? What have all the innocent people done to them? I don’t understand.
Great post, Shelly, and I agree
Thank you far participating in the conversation Matias. I have no answers for you, but I hope that common sense will prevail. Soon! In the mean time we can only try to make the world a better place through our thoughts and actions. Be well my friend. 😀
Great article Shelly! On a similar note, I had some issues with the series 13 mini figures. I was collecting them with my 4 year old niece, to get her into Lego and allow me to build my collection. 8/16 of the minifigures had weapons, and trying to explain to a 4 year old what all the characters and accessories were was really tricky. It was easier for her to understand the unicorn girl than it was the samurai with two katanas. When I then photograph these aggressive or evil minifigures, I try my best to put them in more positive situations. This makes the photography more challenging as well as making the photographer more responsible for their images.
Oh Stacy I feel your pain! These last few mini figure series have been cool, but very adult oriented. I appreciate the samurai because she is a strong female character (not a lego strong suit) but she is awfully angry. Maybe pick and choose your mini figures to share with your niece that are from many different series? Or the Lego elves are really lovely? The figures are hard to photography, but it is a series I would probably play with. 😀
I like your idea of personal responsibility. We all have to realize our thoughts and deeds have consequences. Just because we don’t see them, doesn’t mean they don’t exist.
Thank you for joining the conversation! Shelly
Great post Shelly. There is really only one genre of art that I can think of that glorifies violence (as opposed to reporting, protesting or parodying), and that is film and TV. Given that a good proportion of toys are based on films and TV shows you can see how toy photographs can easily drift towards violent scenes mimicking their pseudo-real-life versions.
I don’t entirely agree with your comment about Vader, specifically LEGO Vader, I think the LEGO version is symbolically different to a more realistic model. The stubby LEGO version feels more like a toothless tiger, a classic bully, all bravado. That’s how I try to treat him in my photos. Even the ones where I’ve tried to make him look a bit “epic” there is an intended irony in the way a cute figure is trying to be powerful; a Star Wars version of Kim Jong Il in “Team America”.
Thanks Mike, I’m glad you enjoyed the post. You make a great point that so many of the toys we collect and photograph have their beginnings in TV or Movies. I will admit it would be hard to take a sympathetic photograph of Freddy Krueger, nor would it be appropriate. I know those photos have a place within our community.
We can debate Vader another day. I realize he has morphed into something other than what he was when he was first introduced on screen, as have the stormtroopers. Maybe I don’t take that into account and I still think of him as the evil character that ordered the destruction of an entire planet of innocent people. First impressions are hard to shake.
I am writing these comments while images from the book War Toys flash across my screen. If you are not familiar with it check out this link. http://www.wartoysproject.com Maybe it’s not the best imagery for this moment in time.
Thanks Mike for always being the voice of reason and an excellent blog mate. 😀
Great discussion to start Shelly. I guess with Vader in particular the complexity of the character can be taken into consideration – that and the fact that he does choose good over evil in the end. I really think the context we place Lego Vader in is what turns the image one way or another. The mini figure in and of itself is not necessarily violent. The same can be said for stormtroopers – who are essentially pawns caught up in the crazy world. Again the responsibility is with photographer and how they present the character… but maybe I’m just being slow to give up two of my favourite subjects(!?) Very timely post though Shelly. Thanks again for starting the discussion – it’s certainly made me think.
I would never ask anyone to give up on Vader or any of the villains that occupy our pop culture world. They occupy an important role in our quest to understand the roles of good and evil in our world. All I am asking is for people to think about the images they put out there. I think it’s a pretty simple request and I am gratified by the number of people who are looking at their imagery with a fresh view point. I couldn’t ask for more.
Bravo. Keep up the great work 🙂
Well said, Shelly! What I find glaring in the toy photography community, specifically in LEGO photographers, is not only violence, but the customization of military or war based minifigs and builds. LEGO has long stood their ground to avoid making toys that promote such violence (with the exception of the rare Toy Story army man minifig or a HYDRA tank from Captain America), and I can’t help but feel a bit offended when someone in the LEGO community goes out of their way to make soldiers minifigs armed to the teeth with 3D printed machine guns and grenades.
That is a conundrum. I have always avoided the third party resellers of military mini figs and accessories. I am grateful my son has only limited interest in that part of lego. I am always shocked when people will make replicas of guns from LEGO. But I always have to remind myself it is a free country and I don’t have to participate. We have stopped buying the LEGO advent City calendar because it always includes robbers. I never understood why this set, of all sets, has to include the threat of violence. In the mean time, at least we can vote with our wallets.
A difficult subject indeed and I get what you are saying.
Myself, I’m mindful of my audience — which increasingly is very different from my original intended audience of adults — so I try not shoot anything that would require explanation from or filtering by a grown-up .
I’m also well aware that my subject of choice is a kid’s toy — originally intended to be, at least — so I try to keep it kid-friendly.
I think some violence is ok, however. I mean, my 4-year-old is attracted to lightsabers, guns and swords even though all I let him watch are shows like Bubble Guppies and Paw Patrol. I can see that he views these things as somewhat removed from him and toys (Star Wars, TMNT, etc) but that war and violence in the real adult world are scary and to be avoided.
I’d rather not see all the excessive gore (and sexual innuendo) so I simply don’t follow people who enjoy those themes a lot. They’re free to explore their dark side, IMHO, but I don’t have to witness it.
Anna, it is so nice to see you her eon the blog! Thank you for joining the conversation!
I think all we can ask from any of our fellow photographers is to think twice before posting. We are all adults and we can make our own decisions. We are also more than capable of following and unfollowing those sites that we enjoy the most. There is plenty of room for everyone and all view points on Instagram.
I am lucky my son is not attracted to guns and light sabers. There was a time when he loved watching Tom & Jerry (I dare you to find a more violent show). This ended when he threw a piece of LEGO at his older sister’s head with such force that he drew blood and left a scar. I think the real world d experience of blood and pain did not match the no reprecussions violence he saw in the comics and it was eye opening for him.
Life often gives you lessons when you least expect them. Lets hope our world, both imaginary and real, becomes a little less dark in the not too distant future. Shelly
I’m totally guilty of this, especially with my gaming miniatures that are designed for war gaming. It’s.. a difficult line to walk, honestly. Monsters and angry robots fuel my imagination, but they send a message that doesn’t reflect my personal feelings and beliefs.
I need to think about this more. Thanks for the nudge, Shelly!
Dave all I can ask is that you act with intention. If your gaming miniatures are an honest part of your passion, then it seems only fair that you photograph them and enjoy the process. Whatever anyone puts out there, they need to do it with intention and maybe pause and think before posting. I appreciate your response and honestly, I realize this is difficult subject for us all to address. But I have the feeling we are all going to be making some tough decisions in the not too distant future. All my best to you, Shelly
Interesting post, Shelly. From a story point of view, it’s always seemed to me that violence is frequently in proportion to the creativity of the narrative. When a story line has run its course and is getting dull or desperate, the first fix is to up the violence because it gets our attention. But attention is not the same as engagement or connection.
Deborah, As always your insights are spot on! Thank you for adding your thoughtful comments to this conversation thread! Shelly xoxo
This is not a well though out post. Toy photography in general is perhaps the most mild display of violence you could possibly find. We live in a world where movies, music, video games, the news and many other platforms continuously display images and acts of violence much more graphic than what ig has. Your argument in general is baseless as you readily admit. While you have not done any studies, many have been done, all finding no correlation between violence in images and violence in real life. (see http://www.massgeneral.org/children/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=3929) or perhaps the more academic article in The Quarterly journal of Economics by Gordon Dahl and Stefano DellaVigna titled, “Does Movie Violence Increase Violent Crime” Also I am confused as to how dirt or debris is violently disturbing. Similarly I do not understand how you think toy photographers are the ones glorifying The Joker and Darth Vader. These characters are extremely popular not only in the US but around the world and toy photography has nothing to do with that popularity. It is a reflection of it. Concern might be necessary if people were taking pictures of say, the readily available Osama Bin Laden figure flying an airplane into towers. But the toy photography, and instagram community in general seem to have more sense. Based on other comments it sounds like you are worried about kids seeing these images. If anyone thinks their child is too young to look through Instagram I suggest not being an absent parent and not letting them on Instagram. Children on Instagram is actually far more likely to be a problem in society than people taking pictures of toys while squirting some red water. What studies have shown is children’s access to the internet and social media is not always but can be detrimental to their health. However watching tom and jerry almost assuredly did not cause your child to throw a lego at his sister. Most likely that was cause by being a boy and at a young age having an underdeveloped frontal lobe.
The saddest part about this post is that it is coming in reaction to your learning of the violence in Paris and Beruit. You are letting the terrorists win. Fear is the easiest motivator for change, however it should almost never be such a catalyst. There are also much much more important things that you could be doing to help people affected by violence than writing on a blog how you don’t like the site of blood and think it is an ill of society. Try picking up the phone and randomly calling a number in Paris, or Beruit. Almost every phone provider had made that free. Or better yet try being affected by violence in other places that happens every single day but for reasons based in eurocentrism is never reported on.
It is both sad and frustrating to see ignorance have such a grip on the world. Ignorance is what makes people like Ben Carson a front runner. Ignorance is what makes people believe that “Arab” countries, who currently are the number one combatants against ISIS, are not doing anything to stop these terrorists. Ignorance is the root of most hate in the world. Please don’t add to the already massive pool of it.
Xavier,
You bring up many good points and honestly I don’t disagree with any of them. I am well aware of the studies that find no correlation between imagery and violence. Yes dirt does not make an image violent. Yes, in a perfect world, parents should supervise their children and they have no business being on IG. This post did not come as a reaction to the recent violence. I have talked with fellow blog mates and only now did I feel the time was right to post it. I will not live in fear, because you are right, if I do then the terrorists would win. My need for change has nothing to do with fear but everything to do with I don’t like how my world is being represented. Yes violence happens every where and Isis isn’t even the most brutal of the terrorist groups out there. Boko Haram anyone? Yes ignorance is a frighting thing. I couldn’t agree with you more. The more we can educate ourselves and spread information not a knee jerk reaction based on fear, the better we will all be. Ignorance and fear are what we need to change. Talking about it is the first step.
I want to thank you for taking the time to voice your opinion. I value the toy community and how we have all been able to voice our opinions in a respectful and I think meaningful way. If we can’t do that here, how can we ever be able to think we can change the world.
All my best to you,
Shelly
also please excuse any typos this is from my phone
and this should not be read as an attack on you or your blog.
Very nicely said Shelly, after reading your blog. I understand your point of view and wanted a more positive outlook on toy pics, but I also understand the artistic side as well on views of others. It’s a very thin fine lines about opinions on the subject of violence. Unfortunately we live in a Society of violence which sells in the media and social media.
Kiwi, thanks for chiming in on this very difficult subject. Did you get a chance to read my second post? http://www.stuckinplastic.com/2015/11/violence-in-toy-photography-epilogue/
I fully realize that people need to use their photography for a creative outlet as well as an emotional one. I also know we live in a society that uses violence as a way to entertain us. The toys we play with often reflect the violent movies that they are based on and the photos should, and do, reflect those same themes
.
No where did I ever ask anyone to censor themselves, I would not ask anyone to do that. We live in a society that is not only violent but increasingly intolerant. I would not want our community to reflect that intolerance and become a place where people are self censoring to please “big brother”. I really appreciate that we were all able to have a civil discussion and get our views out. I don’t expect anyone to agree with me, but I do hope that people will think about what they post and make sure that the images are true to themselves and reflect their own personal beliefs. As a consumer I am more than capable of choosing the feeds I want to support and the ones I don’t.
I am pretty sure this will be a topic we come back to again and again because the world is becoming increasingly confusing.
All my best to you my friend!
Shelly