“To speak out once for all, man only plays when in the full meaning of the word he is man, and he is only completely man when he plays.” (Friedrich Schiller, Letters Upon The Aesthetic Education of Man)
Last year my pictures had to be radically abstract. This year they are all about miniature people. What happened? And am I being inconsistent in my photography?
It’s about pictures
I have always tried to be very clear about one thing: My photography is not ‘about’ the things I photograph – in fact, I could not care less in many instances. It is ‘about’ pictures because I like pictures. This notion is also supposed to help me escape a certain kind criticism: It has been said that photography is the death mask of reality and that it is not able to surpass the reality it depicts. I wanted to go beyond that. I aimed at pictures that are independent of the time and place they show.
The sightseeing crisis
That’s why I have been having difficulties with travel photography for years. If a travel picture were to serve memory, it seemed a bit pointless to me because I was convinced that memory is best served by the mind. And if I continued doing ‘my thing’ – making abstract pictures – while traveling: What would be the point of traveling? I could just make similar pictures at home… I know this may sound a bit extreme, but I often feel that way.
I distinctly remember standing in a square in Sète (France) thinking that one way out of the dilemma might be including H0 scale photographers or construction workers in a sight’s picture – just in order to aim beyond the picture of a palace, a church or whatever sight we were seeing. I pondered that idea for a while.
But I had no no idea how to proceed. All I had was a vague understanding of what Frank Kuhnert, Jennifer Nichole Wells and Slinkachu were doing. So I tried to learn everything about miniature photography first. Then I tried using toy animals. It was fun, and I still love that baby ‘gator! But the animals did not really urge me to carry on. There still is a squirrel sitting in the box, waiting to be fed giant walnuts.
Had fun and got carried away
Finally I decided to give it another shot. I got a H0 figure I liked. A newspaper reader whom, being a keen reader myself, I could identify with. I started to play around with placing him on an actual newspaper. And I liked what I saw in the picture.
Things began to unravel. At some point I had the idea that I could collect phrases and illustrate them by juxtaposing miniatures with real world objects. I started to write them down along with some rough sketches. This technique was new to me, but it still is quite an experience. The ‘Green Notebook’ is filling up – and I have yet to find the time to turn all the phrases into photographs. (The first photo in this post shows where this is going; its title is In Over Their Heads.)
The time issue did not get solved when I bought a set of H0 scale businessmen, looked at each of them closely and eyeing one of them suddenly thought: “Wait a minute! You are Philip Marlowe!” I then tried to do a Film Noir movie still. Soon there was the idea of telling a stereotype detective story with just a few stills. Now the ideas and the pictures are multiplying again. Inspiration obviously comes fom movies, TV shows, and pictures but detective novels and music play a huge role as well.
What am I doing?
So much for the mini history. But for all that the question remains: Am I still in line with the ideas my photography is based on?
Here’s how I understand it: There is an obvious difference between toy-photos-as-representations and the kind of toy photos you are likely to see in this blog (or on the pages of the artists I mentioned above). ‘Mere’ representations are often used in manufacturers’ catalogues; they are intended to show nothing but the toy in question – just google Preiser Geschäftsleute to get an impression.
In the more artistic images, however, light and composition play a (different) role. More often than not, these pictures also tell stories. I think that it is this narrative that reaches beyond ‘reproducing’ what is given. For me, the difference is comparable to the difference between saying “it’s a beautiful spring day today” and stating the same fact in a poem.
So why did I pick toys as a motive? I still do not know for sure. Maybe it’s because miniature photography allows for more control over the picture (though it is still quite an effort for me). But maybe a man’s just got to do what a man’s got to do, as one of my favourite detectives, quoting John Wayne, once put it.
What about you? Did you ever try your hand at something that then developed a momentum of its own?
And does your general concept of photography influence the way you photograph? How?
I adore hearing your story and your images are stunning. I am so very honored to be mentioned alongside such amazing artists. I’m completely taken aback. Thank you.
As for your last question, I imagine my concept of photography greatly influences the way I photograph. But it’s difficult to say exactly how. I want my toy photos, as I want any photo I take, to be interesting, airy, mysterious and somewhat unattainable. In this all I want them to be beautiful and to evoke an emotion of some kind in the viewer. Toys have allowed me personally a way to create such photos.
The narrative in your images is clear, especially in your Noir series (some of my favorite toy photos ever by the way), and in this you are more than successful at bringing your images far outside of ‘what is given.’ Thanks for sharing your story and thoughts with us.
Thank you, Jennifer! It is both an honour and a great pleasure to join the conversation and share some views here – and I feel I am learning a lot!
You say that toys allow you to create the photos you personally conceive of, and this rings a bell with me: In a way, toy photography feels more personal than much other photography I have pursued. I first thought this was due to the fact that I used objects from our home, but it is the same with the pictures that show no such things. So maybe the feeling originates in the fact that you start with imagining an image…
Thank you again for your kind lines (at first I could not believe my eyes when I read what you had to say about the Noir series).
I’m glad you’ve said this, because for me it feels so much more personal as well. Maybe it’s the intimate nature of the small scenes. But really as you’ve said, many photos do start with imagining what the final product will. And for me what I imagine almost always involves toys.
Tobias, your question regarding starting a project and having it develop a life of its own is the story of my photographic life. Ive always followed the momentum. It worked for me in the world of underwater photography and now I find myself at the end of the LEGO and toy community tail barely hanging on. I plan on ring the experience as long as it remains interesting. Your second question also resonates with me. I try to infuse my best images with a little piece of myself. I tend to be a rather emotional person, and I attempt to channel that energy into my photography. Im not always successful, but that is the goal.
I wonder if I’m attracted to toys because they are a motive that is small, convenient and easy to work with. My last major project required a crew to pull off. I like that with this new series, I can create and develop my photos independently.
Thanks for your beautiful writing. It’s an absolute pleasure to present your work on the blog and to our community.
Thank you for having me here, Shelly! It is a pleasure because I love dicussing pictures, and finding out how other people ‘make it all work.’ Which is something I also learn from your lines above – thanks for the comment!
“What about you? Did you ever try your hand at something that then developed a momentum of its own?”
It seems to be happening Tobias. My wife was always the photographer, but now, most weekends we are out in the forest looking for that perfect moss patch – lol.